Has anyone got NetSpell to work on IIS6 ?  I can't even get the Netspell demo to work from the www.loresoft.com website.  All I get is Page Not Found.

Thanks, Brian

Brian,

 

Check this example:

 

 

The above example is running on IIS 6.0 as well.

 

 

Hi Adam,

I have the Editor working fine.  It's just NetSpell that fails.  I have tried about everything I know of including changing security settings.  I have other .Net pluggins working (Dynamic PDF Active X) so I can't understand why the Netspell dll won't work.

Thanks, Brian

Yes net spell works fine.

You must have .Net installed

You need the following files sto be deployed in the \bin directory for the web application that uses the CuteEditor. You need to place them in the \bin folder in the root directory of your web application.

• NetSpell.SpellChecker.dll
• en-US.dic

OK, I got it working.  When the documentation mentions .Net must be installed I took it as the .Net framework.  Looks like ASP.NET must be installed.

Could somebody please clarify (I am a classic ASP coder)

 

What is the difference between the framework and asp.net?

previous versions of IIS only required the framework, what has changed?

Is there any other dependencies for the server side spell checker to work using IIS 6.0?

 

FYI: If I use the spell checker on this post and there are no spelling I get a client side JS error.  Yes my browser (IE 6.0 SP2) is set to show every script error.  This prompt came up once and I could not replicate it by executing another spell check.  I clicked the error away expecting it to come back - Sorry I should have taken a screen shot.  Interestingly enough I can not replicate the error.

 

TYIA

;;;listed as an 'APPLICATION' in IIS

Do you mean a virtual directory?

 

;;;which fixes most of the problems with the spellchecker once the .NET framework is installed

Which ones does it not fix

 

My question remains:

Wht is the difference between the .Net framework and ASP.NET?

 

TYIA

Gary,

 

>>Will .net 2.0 do the job

 

Yes.

Cute soft

 

Well this post brings back some memories.  I used to think Adam was a machine, he seems to answer almost every post however seemed to simply gives up on myn.  You left so many questions un answered, failed to read my posts properly and are afraid to say 'I don't know'  

 

I hope you guys have more resources now.  The potential was there to have your editor mandated inside the Australian Defense forces Restricted Network, this I told you.  You were helpful up until a point however looking at the big picture you gave up - this is why your editor we purchased has been removed from the network.  I will not be cheeky enough to say which one we are using, its not as a good as yours functionality however they replicated my environment like I asked you to do, which you said you did - You did not, this is evident in several posts on this forum and is supported by your threat to remove my posts.

 

Our company w w w . f r a m e g r o u p . c o m . a u just carried out the biggest MM FLEX implementation in the world w w w . a f r a c c e s s . c o m  - you would have featured here and other places had you given more attention to detail in your responses.  You made me look like a fool with your claims this editor would work in the clearly illustrated strict Defence SOE.  Anyone wishing to see the details search by my user name mat41.  If you think there is any inaccuracy in this message, point out 'exactly where'  I will be happy to refresh your memory.

 

mat41 - A very unhappy person who represents a company you should have got on side with

>> You left so many questions un answered, failed to read my posts properly and are afraid to say 'I don't know'  

 

I'll check all your threads and get back to you later.